Modern distributed systems rely heavily on scheduled background jobs. Whether you are running data synchronization, consent refresh processes, ETL tasks, or reconciliation engines, correct scheduling behavior is critical.
In this article, we’ll walk through a practical, production-grade approach to:
- Extract job execution timestamps from logs
- Capture configured refresh intervals
- Measure actual time between jobs
- Compare real execution timing against expected scheduling intervals
- Generate actionable reports from logs
This guide is fully anonymized, production-safe, and suitable for enterprise environments.
Why This Matters
If your system configuration defines:
userdata.refreshInterval : 120000
or
consent.refreshInterval : 60000
but jobs execute more frequently or less frequently than expected, you may face:
- API rate limit violations
- Data inconsistencies
- Performance degradation
- Thread pool saturation
- SLA breaches
Validating job timing against configured intervals is therefore essential.
Example Log Structure
Let’s assume your log includes:
🔹 RefreshData Job – Start
2024-04-26 16:09:26.640 [...] RequestId=UUID - RefreshData job with id: UUID started and will run 0 consents for
🔹 RefreshData Job – End
2024-04-26 16:09:26.694 [...] RequestId=UUID - RefreshDataJob with id: UUID ended and ran 0 consents in 254 milliseconds
🔹 Configuration Line
2024-04-26 16:09:29.455 [...] userdata.refreshInterval : 120000
Your goal is to measure:
Time between previous job end and next job start
Compare it with the configured refreshInterval
Architecture of the Solution
We need to:
- Extract the refreshInterval (milliseconds → seconds)
- Capture job end timestamps
- Capture next job start timestamps
- Calculate difference
- Print comparison including Request IDs
Production-Ready Python Script
Below is a clean, robust script designed for real-world log files.
import re
import sys
from datetime import datetime
def parse_log_file(filename):
# RefreshData patterns
start_pattern = re.compile(
r"(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2} \d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}).*?RequestId=([\w-]+) - RefreshData job with id: [\w-]+ started"
)
end_pattern = re.compile(
r"(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2} \d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\.\d{3}).*?RequestId=([\w-]+) - RefreshDataJob with id: [\w-]+ ended"
)
interval_pattern = re.compile(
r"userdata\.refreshInterval\s*:\s*(\d+)"
)
refresh_interval = None
last_end_time = None
last_request_id = None
with open(filename, 'r') as file:
for line in file:
# Capture refreshInterval once
if refresh_interval is None:
interval_match = interval_pattern.search(line)
if interval_match:
refresh_interval = int(interval_match.group(1)) / 1000 # ms → seconds
print(f"\nConfigured userdata.refreshInterval = {refresh_interval} seconds\n")
continue
# Detect job start
start_match = start_pattern.search(line)
if start_match:
current_start_time = datetime.strptime(
start_match.group(1),
'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f'
)
current_request_id = start_match.group(2)
if last_end_time:
time_diff = (current_start_time - last_end_time).total_seconds()
deviation = None
if refresh_interval:
deviation = time_diff - refresh_interval
print(f"Previous Job ID: {last_request_id}")
print(f"Current Job ID: {current_request_id}")
print(f"Actual Delay : {time_diff:.3f} seconds")
print(f"Expected Delay : {refresh_interval} seconds")
if deviation is not None:
print(f"Deviation : {deviation:.3f} seconds")
print("-" * 60)
continue
# Detect job end
end_match = end_pattern.search(line)
if end_match:
last_end_time = datetime.strptime(
end_match.group(1),
'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S.%f'
)
last_request_id = end_match.group(2)
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
print("Usage: python verifyJobTime.py <log_file>")
sys.exit(1)
parse_log_file(sys.argv[1])
Example Output
Configured userdata.refreshInterval = 120.0 seconds
Previous Job ID: 6a44bb6e-3207-425d-a47f-ec4b852efebb
Current Job ID: 7f22aa17-abc2-4321-bf21-123456789000
Actual Delay : 121.035 seconds
Expected Delay : 120.0 seconds
Deviation : 1.035 seconds
------------------------------------------------------------
What This Tells You
| Scenario | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Actual ≈ Expected | Scheduler works correctly |
| Actual < Expected | Job may be triggered prematurely |
| Actual > Expected | Thread starvation, GC pause, or scheduling delay |
| Highly inconsistent values | Possible concurrency or timing issues |
Applying the Same Logic to RefreshConsent Jobs
You simply change:
userdata.refreshInterval
to:
consent.refreshInterval
and adjust the regex to match:
RefreshConsent job with id:
RefreshConsent job with id: ... ended
Everything else remains identical.
Enterprise Troubleshooting Insights
In real production systems, deviations usually occur because of:
- JVM GC pauses
- Thread pool exhaustion
- Blocking I/O calls
- Downstream API latency
- Misconfigured scheduler executor
- Clock skew between nodes
- Log buffering delays
Enhancing the Script Further (Optional)
You can extend this solution to:
- Export CSV report
- Generate summary statistics (min / max / avg delay)
- Detect threshold violations automatically
- Plot timing distribution using matplotlib
- Validate both RefreshData and RefreshConsent in one run
- Flag jobs exceeding X% deviation
Final Thoughts
Log-based job timing validation is a powerful, lightweight diagnostic technique that requires:
- No code changes
- No monitoring agents
- No production restarts
Just log access and a structured parser.
If you’re running scheduled data or consent refresh jobs in production, validating execution intervals against configured refreshInterval values should be part of your standard operational checklist.

